What is PubMed?
PubMed comprises more than 26 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
The brilliant thing about PubMed is that all scientific publishers whatever their ranking publishes at PubMed too- so it is comprised of everything- the latest greatest that we do not understand since written by and for scientists, but also the simple stuff which can be very enlightening for every mortal.
Anyway- to me- this query is pretty brilliant- it is on "Adipose + Derived + Regeneretive + Cells" and withe restriction- free papers only!
The below is the result of the day... i.e. come back often, since the listing of this page changes often....
Below you will find the feed of the latest "Free articles" with theme: Adipose Derived Regeneretive Cells"- i.e. ADRCs...
Suction assisted liposuction does not impair the regenerative potential of adipose derived stem cells.
J Transl Med. 2016 May 06;14(1):126
Authors: Duscher D, Luan A, Rennert RC, Atashroo D, Maan ZN, Brett EA, Whittam AJ, Ho N, Lin M, Hu MS, Walmsley GG, Wenny R, Schmidt M, Schilling AF, Machens HG, Huemer GM, Wan DC, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC
BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) have been identified as a population of multipotent cells with promising applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. ASCs are abundant in fat tissue, which can be safely harvested through the minimally invasive procedure of liposuction. However, there exist a variety of different harvesting methods, with unclear impact on ASC regenerative potential. The aim of this study was thus to compare the functionality of ASCs derived from the common technique of suction-assisted lipoaspiration (SAL) versus resection.
METHODS: Human adipose tissue was obtained from paired abdominoplasty and SAL samples from three female donors, and was processed to isolate the stromal vascular fraction. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to determine ASC yield, and cell viability was assayed. Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation capacity were assessed in vitro using phenotypic staining and quantification of gene expression. Finally, ASCs were applied in an in vivo model of tissue repair to evaluate their regenerative potential.
RESULTS: SAL specimens provided significantly fewer ASCs when compared to excised fat tissue, however, with equivalent viability. SAL-derived ASCs demonstrated greater expression of the adipogenic markers FABP-4 and LPL, although this did not result in a difference in adipogenic differentiation. There were no differences detected in osteogenic differentiation capacity as measured by alkaline phosphatase, mineralization or osteogenic gene expression. Both SAL- and resection-derived ASCs enhanced significantly cutaneous healing and vascularization in vivo, with no significant difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: SAL provides viable ASCs with full capacity for multi-lineage differentiation and tissue regeneration, and is an effective method of obtaining ASCs for cell-based therapies.
PMID: 27153799 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]